Journal of Clinical Lipidology
Volume 6, Issue 1 , Pages 5-18 , January 2012

Effects of eicosapentaenoic acid and docosahexaenoic acid on low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and other lipids: A review

  • Terry A. Jacobson, MD

      Affiliations

    • Office of Health Promotion and Disease Prevention, Department of Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Faculty Office Building, 49 Jesse Hill Jr. Drive SE, Atlanta, GA 30303, USA
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author.
  • ,
  • Sara B. Glickstein, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Rete Biomedical Communications Corp., Wyckoff, NJ, USA
  • ,
  • Jonathan D. Rowe, PhD

      Affiliations

    • When the manuscript was drafted, Dr. Rowe was an employee of, and minor shareholder in, the study sponsor. His current affiliation is Dignity Sciences Ltd.
    • Dignity Sciences Ltd, Dublin, Ireland
  • ,
  • Paresh N. Soni, MD, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Amarin Corporation, Mystic, CT, USA

Received 4 April 2011 ,Accepted 23 October 2011.

  • Image Result

    Median percent change in TG and LDL-C in Omacor/Lovaza studies pooled by baseline TG inclusion criteria (From CDER-FDA Statistical Review10). CDER, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research; C.I., confi

    Median percent change in TG and LDL-C in Omacor/Lovaza studies pooled by baseline TG inclusion criteria (From CDER-FDA Statistical Review10). CDER, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research; C.I., confidence interval; FDA, Food and Drug Administration; LDL-C, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; TG, triglyceride. (To convert TG to mmol/L, multiply by 0.0113.)

  • Image Result
    Comparison of percent changes in mean values from baseline to end point for EPA or DHA treatment. Percent changes in mean TG or LDL-C, adjusted by placebo or control group values for DHA (filled circl

    Comparison of percent changes in mean values from baseline to end point for EPA or DHA treatment. Percent changes in mean TG or LDL-C, adjusted by placebo or control group values for DHA (filled circles) and EPA (open squares), and corresponding 95% CI (dashed lines) are presented. aThe 95% CI was not included where large data dispersion at end point precluded reasonable estimation. ∗N represents the total number of crossover study participants. Egert et al21 and Tanaka et al30 reported median values. BL, baseline; CNTRL, control; DHA, docosahexaenoic acid; EPA, eicosapentaenoic acid; Exp, experimental group; LDL-C, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; PBO, placebo; TG, triglyceride. (To convert LDL-C to mmol/L, multiply by 0.0259; to convert TG to mmol/L, multiply by 0.0113.)

PII: S1933-2874(11)00745-8

doi: 10.1016/j.jacl.2011.10.018

Journal of Clinical Lipidology
Volume 6, Issue 1 , Pages 5-18 , January 2012