« Previous
Next »
Journal of Clinical Lipidology
Volume 6, Issue 1
, Pages
5-18
, January 2012
Effects of eicosapentaenoic acid and docosahexaenoic acid on low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and other lipids: A review
-
Median percent change in TG and LDL-C in Omacor/Lovaza studies pooled by baseline TG inclusion criteria (From CDER-FDA Statistical Review10). CDER, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research; C.I., confi
Median percent change in TG and LDL-C in Omacor/Lovaza studies pooled by baseline TG inclusion criteria (From CDER-FDA Statistical Review10). CDER, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research; C.I., confidence interval; FDA, Food and Drug Administration; LDL-C, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; TG, triglyceride. (To convert TG to mmol/L, multiply by 0.0113.)
-
Comparison of percent changes in mean values from baseline to end point for EPA or DHA treatment. Percent changes in mean TG or LDL-C, adjusted by placebo or control group values for DHA (filled circlComparison of percent changes in mean values from baseline to end point for EPA or DHA treatment. Percent changes in mean TG or LDL-C, adjusted by placebo or control group values for DHA (filled circles) and EPA (open squares), and corresponding 95% CI (dashed lines) are presented. aThe 95% CI was not included where large data dispersion at end point precluded reasonable estimation. ∗N represents the total number of crossover study participants. Egert et al21 and Tanaka et al30 reported median values. BL, baseline; CNTRL, control; DHA, docosahexaenoic acid; EPA, eicosapentaenoic acid; Exp, experimental group; LDL-C, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; PBO, placebo; TG, triglyceride. (To convert LDL-C to mmol/L, multiply by 0.0259; to convert TG to mmol/L, multiply by 0.0113.)
PII: S1933-2874(11)00745-8
doi: 10.1016/j.jacl.2011.10.018
© 2012 National Lipid Association. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
« Previous
Next »
Journal of Clinical Lipidology
Volume 6, Issue 1
, Pages
5-18
, January 2012
