Journal of Clinical Lipidology
Volume 2, Issue 4 , Pages 267-273, August 2008

The importance of non–HDL cholesterol reporting in lipid management

  • Michael J. Blaha, MD, MPH

      Affiliations

    • The Johns Hopkins Ciccarone Center for the Prevention of Heart Disease, Baltimore, MD, USA
  • ,
  • Roger S. Blumenthal, MD

      Affiliations

    • The Johns Hopkins Ciccarone Center for the Prevention of Heart Disease, Baltimore, MD, USA
  • ,
  • Eliot A. Brinton, MD

      Affiliations

    • University of Utah School of Medicine, 420 Chipeta Way, Rm 1160, Salt Lake City, UT, 84108 USA
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author.
  • ,
  • Terry A. Jacobson, MD

      Affiliations

    • Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
  • ,
  • National Lipid Association Taskforce on Non-HDL Cholesterol

      Affiliations

    • The members of the National Lipid Association Taskforce on Non-HDL Cholesterol are: Roger Blumenthal, MD, Eliot Brinton, MD, John R. Crouse, MD, Michael H. Davidson, MD, Anne C. Goldberg, MD, Terry Jacobson, MD, Peter H. Jones, MD, John Kostis, MD, James McKenney, PharmD, Neil J. Stone, MD, Dan Wise, MD, Janet Long, MSN, David Capuzzi, MD, and Maria Lopes-Virella, MD.

Received 18 June 2008; accepted 24 June 2008. published online 01 July 2008.

Abstract 

Plasma levels of lipids and lipoproteins are essential to the management of lipid disorders by generalists and by practitioners of the emerging specialty of clinical lipidology. The routine lipid panel consists of total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), and triglycerides. Several additional lipid parameters are emerging as potentially valuable adjuncts to the standard panel, including measurements of apolipoproteins and LDL particle size and concentration, but most of these serve mainly as research tools at present. One major exception is non–HDL-C, which is readily available for routine clinical use. This review outlines some of the numerous research studies that clearly establish the clinical utility and even preeminence of non–HDL-C as a comprehensive measure of atherogenic lipoproteins. Non–HDL-C was highlighted as a key secondary goal of therapy several years ago in the National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III national lipid treatment guidelines and recently was further emphasized as a major goal of therapy in the consensus guidelines for lipoprotein management in patients with cardiometabolic risk from the American Diabetes Association and the American College of Cardiology. Non–HDL-C is superior to LDL-C for the prediction of cardiovascular events and has many other compelling advantages over LDL-C and other traditional lipid parameters. Importantly, it can be calculated directly from values in routine lipid panels, at no added expense. It is our opinion that non–HDL-C should be reported on all routine lipid profiles and used regularly in the management of dyslipidemia for optimal prevention of atherosclerosis and cardiovascular disease.

Keywords: Lipid management, Lipidology, Lipid panel reporting, Lipoproteins, Non–HDL-C

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S1933-2874(08)00274-2

doi:10.1016/j.jacl.2008.06.013

Journal of Clinical Lipidology
Volume 2, Issue 4 , Pages 267-273, August 2008