Journal of Clinical Lipidology
Volume 2, Issue 6 , Pages 436-446, December 2008

Ezetimibe/simvastatin compared with atorvastatin or rosuvastatin in lowering to specified levels both LDL-C and each of five other emerging risk factors for coronary heart disease: Non–HDL-cholesterol, TC/HDL-C, apolipoprotein B, apo-B/apo-A-I, or C-reactive protein

  • Michael H. Davidson, MD

      Affiliations

    • University of Chicago, 515 N. State Street, Suite 2700, Chicago, IL USA
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author
  • ,
  • Nicola Abate, MD

      Affiliations

    • University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX USA
  • ,
  • Christie M. Ballantyne, MD

      Affiliations

    • Baylor College of Medicine and Methodist DeBakey Heart and Vascular Center, Houston, TX USA
  • ,
  • Alberico L. Catapano, PhD

      Affiliations

    • University of Milan, Milan, Italy
  • ,
  • Xia Xu, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Merck & Co., Inc., North Wales, PA USA
  • ,
  • Jianxin Lin, MS

      Affiliations

    • Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ USA
  • ,
  • Elizabeth Rosenberg, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Merck & Co., Inc., North Wales, PA USA
  • ,
  • Andrew M. Tershakovec, MD, MPH

      Affiliations

    • Merck & Co., Inc., North Wales, PA USA

Received 1 October 2008; accepted 19 October 2008. published online 24 October 2008.

Background

Recent evidence suggests that in addition to low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), apolipoprotein B (Apo-B), non–high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (non–HDL-C), some lipoprotein ratios, and C-reactive protein (CRP) are predictive of coronary heart disease (CHD) risk. This post-hoc analysis of two trials comparing single-tablet ezetimibe/simvastatin (EZE/SIMVA) to atorvastatin (ATORVA) or rosuvastatin (ROSUVA) evaluates the proportion of patients attaining LDL-C <70 mg/dL and specific levels of these emerging risk factors.

Methods

These were double-blind, 6-week, parallel group trials of hypercholesterolemic patients randomized to milligram equivalent doses of ATORVA versus EZE 10 mg/SIMVA, or to usual starting, next higher, and maximum doses of ROSUVA versus EZE/SIMVA. This analysis examined the percent of patients in prespecified dose comparisons and overall achievement of LDL-C <70 mg/dL and/or Apo-B <90 mg/dL, total cholesterol (TC)/HDL-C <4.0, or Apo-B/Apo-A-I <0.7 among all treated patients, non–HDL-C <100 mg/dL among patients with baseline triglycerides ≥200 mg/dL, or CRP <2.0 mg/L among patients with baseline CRP ≥2.0 mg/L.

Results

Within each trial, baseline characteristics were similar among groups. At all dose comparisons, significantly more patients receiving EZE/SIMVA reached LDL-C <70 mg/dL and achieved both LDL-C <70 mg/dL and either Apo-B <90 mg/dL, TC/HDL-C <4.0, or Apo-B/Apo-A-I <0.7 (EZE/SIMVA versus ATORVA) compared to ATORVA and ROSUVA. For most dose comparisons, significantly more patients receiving EZE/SIMVA attained both LDL-C <70 mg/dL and either non–HDL-C <100 mg/dL or CRP <2 mg/L compared to ATORVA or ROSUVA.

Conclusion

The greater efficacy related to changes in blood lipids of EZE/SIMVA compared with both ATORVA and ROSUVA extends to changes in many emerging risk factors. Ultimate clinical implications of these findings still need to be defined.

Keywords: Atorvastatin, Coronary heart disease: Ezetimibe, Hypercholesterolemia, Rosuvastatin, Simvastatin

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S1933-2874(08)00889-1

doi:10.1016/j.jacl.2008.10.003

Journal of Clinical Lipidology
Volume 2, Issue 6 , Pages 436-446, December 2008