Journal of Clinical Lipidology
Volume 2, Issue 6 , Pages 453-463, December 2008

Concomitant use of statins and CYP3A4 inhibitors in administrative claims and electronic medical records databases

  • Eileen E. Ming, MPH, ScD

      Affiliations

    • AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP, 1800 Concord Pike, Wilmington, DE 19850 USA
    • University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA USA
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author
  • ,
  • Michael H. Davidson, MD

      Affiliations

    • University of Chicago Pritzker School of Medicine, Chicago, IL USA
  • ,
  • Sanjay K. Gandhi, PhD

      Affiliations

    • AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP, 1800 Concord Pike, Wilmington, DE 19850 USA
  • ,
  • Marcelo Marotti, MD, PhD

      Affiliations

    • AstraZeneca, Alderley Park, Macclesfield, Cheshire, United Kingdom
  • ,
  • Carolyn G. Miles, MPH

      Affiliations

    • AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP, 1800 Concord Pike, Wilmington, DE 19850 USA
  • ,
  • Xiongkan Ke, MS

      Affiliations

    • AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP, 1800 Concord Pike, Wilmington, DE 19850 USA
  • ,
  • James M. McKenney, PharmD

      Affiliations

    • National Clinical Research, Richmond, VA USA

Received 10 October 2008; accepted 19 October 2008. published online 29 October 2008.

Background

Patients may experience increased risk of adverse drug interactions when statins are administered concomitantly with cytochrome P450 3A4 (CYP3A4) inhibitors.

Objective

To determine patient numbers in routine clinical practice with concomitant exposure to CYP3A4-metabolized statins and CYP3A4 inhibitors and highlight potential risk for adverse drug interaction.

Methods

Exposure to prescription medications over 1 year (2005–2006) was evaluated from patient records: US PharMetrics Integrated Patient-Centric administrative claims database and the US General Electric Medical System (GEMS) database. Rates of concomitant prescribing of statins with CYP3A4 inhibitors (listed in United States of America product labels and all identified potential inhibitors) were examined in the cohort overall, in those aged ≥65 years, and in those receiving higher doses of statins.

Results

Overall, 951,166 patient records were included (PharMetrics n = 650,825; GEMS, n = 300,341). Of these, 792,081 (83%) patients used a CYP3A4-metabolized statin as opposed to a non–CYP3A4-metabolized statin (17%). Findings from both databases were consistent. Overall, 25–30% of patients given a CYP3A4-metabolized statin were concomitantly exposed to a CYP3A4 inhibitor, including approximately 9% concomitantly exposed to a labeled inhibitor, findings consistent with those in patients aged ≥65 years, and patients on higher doses of statins.

Conclusions

Clinicians frequently co-prescribe CYP3A4-metabolized statins with CYP3A4 inhibitors. Physician education regarding the impact of these inhibitors on the metabolism of lovastatin, simvastatin, and atrovastatin is needed. Further studies are also needed to determine whether concomitant administration of a non–CYP3A4-metabolized statin (such as fluvastatin, pravastatin, or rosuvastatin) with a CYP3A4 inhibitor, may reduce adverse event rates in routine clinical practice.

Keywords: Adverse effects, Cardiovascular diseases, CYP3A4 protein, Cytochrome P450 enzyme system, Drug interactions, Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA reductase inhibitors, Human, Hyperlipidemia, Polypharmacy

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S1933-2874(08)00893-3

doi:10.1016/j.jacl.2008.10.007

Journal of Clinical Lipidology
Volume 2, Issue 6 , Pages 453-463, December 2008