Journal of Clinical Lipidology
Volume 4, Issue 4 , Pages 305-309, July 2010

Adjustment of direct high-density lipoprotein cholesterol measurements according to intercurrent triglyceride corrects for interference by triglyceride-rich lipoproteins

  • Nimalie J. Perera, MBBS, FRACP, FRCPA

      Affiliations

    • Department of Clinical Biochemistry, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Missenden Road, Camperdown, NSW 2050, Australia
  • ,
  • Jennifer C. Burns, BSc, Dip.Ed

      Affiliations

    • Department of Clinical Biochemistry, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Missenden Road, Camperdown, NSW 2050, Australia
  • ,
  • Ryle S. Perera, BS, MS, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Faculty of Business and Economics, Macquarie University, NSW, Australia
  • ,
  • Barry Lewis, BSc, MB ChB, PhD, MD, FRCP, FRCPath

      Affiliations

    • Faculty of Medicine, University of Sydney, NSW, Australia
  • ,
  • David R. Sullivan, MBBS, FRACP, FRCPA

      Affiliations

    • Department of Clinical Biochemistry, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Missenden Road, Camperdown, NSW 2050, Australia
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author.

Received 30 December 2009; accepted 13 April 2010. published online 26 April 2010.

Background

Low plasma levels of high-density-lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) and high triglyceride (TG) are strongly associated with cardiovascular disease (CVD). Clinical recognition of this high-risk population demands accurate measurement of HDL-C, whereas cost and clinical demand dictate that optimal HDL-C measurement requires fully automated methods that avoid manual precipitation. Commercial techniques use specific reagents to selectively expose and “directly” measure cholesterol in HDL. However, these “direct” methods may experience interference from the cholesterol content of triglyceride-rich-lipoproteins (TRL), leading to analytical overestimation of HDL-C, with subsequent underestimation of low-density-lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and of CVD risk.

Objective

The aim of this study was to develop a method to overcome this interference.

Methods

Serum/Li+-heparin plasma samples from consecutive patients were analyzed for HDL-C by the comparison of three generations of the Roche Diagnostics, HDL-C assay on a Hitachi-917 or Modular-PPE analyzer. HDL-C measurement was performed before and after removal of TRL by ultracentrifugation (“direct” HDL-C and HDL-UC, respectively). We examined the effect of TG on the relationship between HDL-UC and “direct” HDL-C. Analysis of variance multiregression analysis was performed for each generation of the commercial assay.

Results

We observed progressive TG interference that increased “direct” HDL-C by 10% to 15% or more in moderately hypertriglyceridemic samples (<600 mg/dL). Predictive equations were derived for each generation of the assay to estimate HDL-C in the absence of TRL.

Conclusions

This study casts doubt on the specificity of “direct” HDL-C assays in the presence of hypertriglyceridemia. The use of assay-specific correction formulae to adjust for interference from TRL reduces the overestimation of HDL-C that influences CVD risk calculation, treatment, and follow-up of patients.

Keywords: Cardiovascular disease (CVD), High-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), Interference, Prediction formulae, Triglycerides (TG), Triglyceride-rich lipoproteins (TRL)

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S1933-2874(10)00218-7

doi:10.1016/j.jacl.2010.04.002

Journal of Clinical Lipidology
Volume 4, Issue 4 , Pages 305-309, July 2010