Advertisement
Review article| Volume 1, ISSUE 6, P564-574, December 2007

Download started.

Ok

Management of stable patients with coronary heart disease: Clinical implications of the Clinical Outcomes Utilizing Revascularization and Aggressive Drug Evaluation (COURAGE) trial

  • Todd M. Brown
    Correspondence
    Corresponding author.
    Affiliations
    Division of Cardiovascular Diseases, University of Alabama at Birmingham, LHRB 306, 701 19th Street South, Birmingham, AL 35294, USA

    Health Services and Outcomes Research Training Program, University of Alabama at Birmingham, LHRB 306, 701 19th Street South, Birmingham, AL 35294, USA
    Search for articles by this author
  • Vera Bittner
    Affiliations
    Division of Cardiovascular Diseases, University of Alabama at Birmingham, LHRB 306, 701 19th Street South, Birmingham, AL 35294, USA
    Search for articles by this author
Published:October 22, 2007DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacl.2007.10.009

      Abstract

      Early coronary revascularization has been shown to reduce major adverse cardiovascular events in patients with acute coronary syndromes. In patients with stable coronary heart disease (CHD), however, coronary revascularization does not reduce death or myocardial infarction compared to intensive medical therapy. The Clinical Outcomes Utilizing Revascularization and Aggressive Drug Evaluation (COURAGE) trial was the first to study whether coronary revascularization performed in addition to medical therapy, rather than as an alternative, would reduce death or myocardial infarction in patients with stable CHD. Between 1999 and 2004, 2287 patients were enrolled in 50 centers throughout Canada and the United States. After a median follow-up of 4.6 years, revascularization performed in addition to intensive medical therapy did not result in reduced mortality or myocardial infarction compared to medical therapy alone. At the end of follow-up, anginal control was similar in both groups, although patients receiving medical therapy only did require more antianginal medications, and one-third ultimately required revascularization. We review the strengths, limitations, and clinical relevance of the COURAGE trial in the context of the current literature on the benefits of medical management and coronary revascularization in patients with stable CHD.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Journal of Clinical Lipidology
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Rosamond W.
        • Flegal K.
        • Friday G.
        • et al.
        Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics–2007 Update.
        Circulation. 2007; 115: e69-e171
        • Antman E.M.
        • Anbe D.T.
        • Armstrong P.W.
        • et al.
        ACC/AHA guidelines for the management of patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee to Revise the 1999 Guidelines for the Management of Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction).
        2004 (Available at www.acc.org/clinical/guidelines/stemi/index.pdf.)
        • Anderson J.L.
        • Adams C.D.
        • Antman E.M.
        • et al.
        ACC/AHA 2007 guidelines for the management of patients with unstable angina/non–ST-elevation myocardial infarction: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the 2002 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Unstable Angina/Non–ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction): developed in collaboration with the American College of Emergency Physicians, American College of Physicians, Society for Academic Emergency Medicine, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and Society of Thoracic Surgeons.
        J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007; 50: e1-e157
        • Gibbons R.J.
        • Abrams J.
        • Chatterjee K.
        • et al.
        ACC/AHA 2002 guideline update for the management of patients with chronic stable angina: a report of the American College of Cardiology/ American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee to Update the 1999 Guidelines for the Management of Patients with Chronic Stable Angina). 2002.
        (Available at)
        • Lin G.A.
        • Dudley R.A.
        • Redberg R.F.
        Cardiologists’ use of percutaneous coronary interventions for stable coronary artery disease.
        Arch Intern Med. 2007; 167: 1604-1609
        • Feldman D.N.
        • Gade C.L.
        • Slotwiner A.J.
        • et al.
        Comparison of outcomes of percutaneous coronary interventions in patients of three age groups (<60, 60 to 80, and >80 years) (from the New York State Angioplasty Registry).
        Am J Cardiol. 2006; 98: 1334-1339
        • Boden W.E.
        • O’Rourke R.A.
        • Teo K.K.
        • et al.
        Optimal medical therapy with or without PCI for stable coronary disease.
        N Engl J Med. 2007; 356: 1503-1516
        • Wharton Jr, T.P.
        • Umans V.A.
        • Peels H.O.
        PCI for stable coronary disease.
        N Engl J Med. 2007; 357: 415
        • Katritsis D.G.
        • Ioannidis J.P.
        Percutaneous coronary intervention versus conservative therapy in nonacute coronary artery disease: a meta-analysis.
        Circulation. 2005; 111: 2906-2912
        • The Veterans Administration Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery Cooperative Study Group
        Eleven-year survival in the Veterans Administration randomized trial of coronary bypass surgery for stable angina.
        N Engl J Med. 1984; 311: 1333-1339
        • Coronary Artery Surgery Study (CASS) Principal Investigators and Associates
        CASS: a randomized trial of coronary bypass surgery.
        Circulation. 1983; 68: 939-950
        • Varnauskas E.
        • European Coronary Surgery Study Group
        Twelve-year follow-up of survival in the randomized European Coronary Surgery Study.
        N Engl J Med. 1988; 319: 332-337
        • Yusuf S.
        • Zucker D.
        • Peduzzi P.
        • et al.
        Effect of coronary artery bypass graft surgery on survival: overview of 10-year results from randomised trials by the Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery Trialists Collaboration.
        Lancet. 1994; 344: 563-570
        • Hoffman S.N.
        • TenBrook Jr, J.A.
        • Wolf M.P.
        • Pauker S.G.
        • Salem D.N.
        • Wong J.B.
        A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing coronary artery bypass graft with percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty: one- to eight-year outcomes.
        J Am Coll Cardiol. 2003; 41: 1293-1304
        • The Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization Investigation (BARI) Investigators
        Comparison of coronary bypass surgery with angioplasty in patients with multivessel disease.
        N Engl J Med. 1996; 335: 217-225
        • The BARI Investigators
        Influence of diabetes on 5-year mortality and morbidity in a randomized trial comparing CABG and PTCA in patients with multivessel disease: the Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization Investigation (BARI).
        Circulation. 1997; 96: 1761-1769
        • Freemantle N.
        • Cleland J.
        • Young P.
        • Mason J.
        • Harrison J.
        Beta blockade after myocardial infarction: systematic review and meta regression analysis.
        BMJ. 1999; 318: 1730-1737
        • The Heart Outcomes Prevention Evaluation Study Investigators
        Effects of an angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitor, ramipril, on cardiovascular events in high-risk patients.
        N Engl J Med. 2000; 342: 145-153
        • The EURopean Trial
        On reduction of cardiac events with Perindopril in stable coronary Artery disease Investigators.
        Lancet. 2003; 362: 782-788
        • Rossouw J.E.
        Lipid-lowering interventions in angiographic trials.
        Am J Cardiol. 1995; 76: 86C-92C
        • Rodriguez-Granillo G.A.
        • Agostoni P.
        • Garcia-Garcia H.M.
        • et al.
        Meta-analysis of the studies accessing temporal changes in coronary plaque volume using intravascular ultrasound.
        Am J Cardiol. 2007; 99: 5-10
        • Nicholls S.J.
        • Tuzcu E.M.
        • Sipahi I.
        • et al.
        Statins, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and regression of coronary atherosclerosis.
        JAMA. 2007; 297: 499-508
        • O’Keefe J.H.
        • Cordain L.
        • Harris W.H.
        • Moe R.M.
        • Vogel R.
        Optimal low-density lipoprotein is 50 to 70 mg/dl.
        J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004; 43: 2142-2146
        • Buchwald H.
        • Matts J.P.
        • Fitch L.L.
        • et al.
        Changes in sequential coronary arteriograms and subsequent coronary events.
        JAMA. 1992; 268: 1429-1433
        • Brown B.G.
        • Zhao X.-Q.
        • Sacco D.E.
        • Albers J.J.
        Lipid lowering and plaque regression: new insights into prevention of plaque disruption and clinical events in coronary disease.
        Circulation. 1993; 87: 1781-1791
        • Schuler G.
        • Hambrecht R.
        • Schlierf G.
        • et al.
        Regular physical exercise and low-fat diet: effects on progression of coronary artery disease.
        Circulation. 1992; 86: 1-11
        • Gould K.L.
        • Matucci J.P.
        • Goldberg D.I.
        • et al.
        Short-term cholesterol lowering decreases size and severity of perfusion abnormalities by positron emission tomography after dipyridamole in patients with coronary artery disease.
        Circulation. 1994; 89: 1530-1538
        • Falk E.
        • Shah P.K.
        • Fuster V.
        Coronary plaque disruption.
        Circulation. 1995; 92: 657-671
        • Libby P.
        What have we learned about the biology of atherosclerosis?.
        Am J Cardiol. 2001; 88: 3J-6J
        • Taylor R.S.
        • Brown A.
        • Ebrahim S.
        • et al.
        Exercise-based rehabilitation for patients with coronary heart disease: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
        Am J Med. 2004; 116: 682-692
        • Witt B.J.
        • Jacobsen S.J.
        • Weston S.A.
        • et al.
        Cardiac rehabilitation after myocardial infarction in the community.
        J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004; 44: 988-996
        • Wilt T.J.
        • Bloomfield H.E.
        • MacDonald R.
        • et al.
        Effectiveness of statin therapy in adults with coronary heart disease.
        Arch Intern Med. 2004; 164: 1427-1436
        • Afilalo J.
        • Majdan A.A.
        • Eisenberg M.J.
        Intensive statin therapy in acute coronary syndromes and stable coronary heart disease: a comparative meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.
        Heart. 2007; 93: 914-921
        • Hambrecht R.
        • Walther C.
        • Mobius-Winkler S.
        • et al.
        Percutaneous coronary angioplasty compared with exercise training in patients with stable coronary artery disease.
        Circulation. 2004; 109: 1371-1378
        • Pitt B.
        • Waters D.
        • Brown W.V.
        • et al.
        Aggressive lipid-lowering therapy compared with angioplasty in stable coronary artery disease.
        N Engl J Med. 1999; 341: 70-76
        • The Post Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Trial Investigators
        The effect of aggressive lowering of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels and low-dose anticoagulation on obstructive changes in saphenous-vein coronary-artery bypass grafts.
        N Engl J Med. 1997; 336: 153-162
        • Knatterud G.L.
        • Rosenberg Y.
        • Campeau L.
        • et al.
        Long-term effects on clinical outcomes of aggressive lowering of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels and low-dose anticoagulation in the Post Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Trial.
        Circulation. 2000; 102: 157-165
        • Sdringola S.
        • Nakagawa K.
        • Nakagawa K.
        • et al.
        Combined intensive lifestyle and pharmacologic lipid treatment further reduce coronary events and myocardial perfusion abnormalities compared with usual-care cholesterol-lowering drugs in coronary artery disease.
        J Am Coll Cardiol. 2003; 41: 263-272
        • Sdringola S.
        • Loghin C.
        • Boccalandro F.
        • Gould K.L.
        Mechanisms of progression and regression of coronary artery disease by PET related to treatment intensity and clinical events at long-term follow-up.
        J Nucl Med. 2006; 47: 59-67
        • LaRosa J.C.
        • Grundy S.M.
        • Waters D.D.
        • et al.
        Intensive lipid lowering with atorvastatin in patients with stable coronary disease.
        N Engl J Med. 2005; 352: 1425-1435
        • Shah A.P.
        • Shavelle D.M.
        • French W.J.
        PCI for stable coronary disease.
        N Engl J Med. 2007; : 357-415
        • Kiat H.
        PCI for stable coronary disease.
        N Engl J Med. 2007; : 357-416
        • Shaw L.J.
        • Heller G.V.
        • Casperson P.
        • et al.
        Gated myocardial perfusion single photon emission computed tomography in the clinical outcomes utilizing revascularization and aggressive drug evaluation (COURAGE) trial, Veterans Administration Cooperative study no. 424.
        J Nucl Cardiol. 2006; 13: 685-698
        • Nagajothi N.
        • Velazquez-Cecena J.-L.
        • Khosla S.
        PCI for stable coronary disease.
        N Engl J Med. 2007; 357: 416-417
        • Boden W.E.
        • Teo K.K.
        • Weintraub W.S.
        PCI for stable coronary disease.
        N Engl J Med. 2007; 357: 417-418
        • Kereiakes D.J.
        • Teirstein P.S.
        • Sarembock I.J.
        • et al.
        The truth and consequences of the COURAGE trial.
        J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007; 50: 1598-1603
        • Weintraub W.S.
        Presented at the American College of Cardiology Annual Scientific Sessions, New Orleans, LA, March 2007.
        (Available at) (November 12, 2007)
        • Kereiakes D.J.
        PCI is no better than medical therapy for stable angina?.
        Cleve Clin J Med. 2007; 74: 637-642
        • Boden W.E.
        It takes COURAGE to alter our belief system.
        Cleve Clin J Med. 2007; 74: 623-633
        • The BARI Investigators
        The final 10-year follow-up results from the BARI randomized trial.
        J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007; 49: 1600-1606
        • Ford E.S.
        • Ajani U.A.
        • Croft J.B.
        • et al.
        Explaining the decrease in US deaths from coronary disease, 1980–2000.
        N Engl J Med. 2007; 356: 2388-2398
        • DeServi S.
        PCI for stable coronary disease.
        N Engl J Med. 2007; : 357-416
        • Mak K.-H.
        PCI for stable coronary disease.
        N Engl J Med. 2007; : 357-417